🔗 Share this article

The action from the Democratic National Committee to block the publication regarding its internal autopsy report concerning the 2024 election seems shocking yet not surprising. Averse to unpleasant candor, the Democrats' governing body operates closer to a PR firm rather than an electoral entity focused on cultivating grassroots capacities for winning elections.

An Environment of Conformity

Reluctant to break with the party establishment's culture of conformity, the committee has continued under the Biden-Harris shadow throughout this past year. Releasing an official autopsy could have demonstrated that party leaders actually want to promote public discourse about the missteps which allowed Donald Trump to return to the White House. Yet, the DNC is proceeding under the pretense that there is little to be learned following the tragic debacle from the last cycle.

Our guiding principle: does this help us win? If the answer is no, it’s a distraction from our fundamental goal," a rationale reportedly given to justify concealing the document.

Key Issues a Report Would Have Examined

Any valuable post-mortem worth its salt would tackle head-on key points of failure. This encompasses:

• Voter Disenchantment: The loss among a significant portion of the electorate who supported the party's candidate in 2020 was decisive in the close recent race.
• The Choice to Run: The stubborn choice of the incumbent to seek re-election, and a very late withdrawal, is viewed as denying the party's base of a genuine choice.
• Abandoning Everyday Americans: During a time of economic anxiety, the electoral effort reportedly accommodating elite contributors and not managing to address the impact of corporate greed.
• The Foreign Policy Factor: An unwillingness to shift an approach regarding the situation in Gaza allegedly caused losing many voters, especially with youth voters, Arab-Americans, Muslim voters.
• Losing Young Voter Backing: Research shows a significant drop-off in Democratic support among young voters.

A Record Shunning Scrutiny

This refusal is consistent with a longstanding habit of evading uncomfortable facts. It recalls an episode where the vast majority of elected Democrat in Congress went along with a sitting president's insistence on running for re-election right up until a disastrous televised debate led to a reversal.

Concurrently, large majorities within the party's base were repeatedly informing pollsters that they did not want the incumbent to run again.

Financial Questions

An honest autopsy might also investigate issues regarding campaign spending, such as what sums went to party strategists and advertising contractors over the course of an electoral effort that burned through an enormous war chest in a short period.

The Underlying Implication

Fundamentally, the secrecy of the official autopsy points to a submission toward the existing power structure responsible for a losing presidential campaign. The message for the party's base – which includes millions of loyal volunteers – is that they cannot be trusted to understand the lessons party chiefs have learned based on an analysis based on feedback from all states.

A political entity unwilling to critically review where it went wrong finds it difficult to climb out of the rut that ended up being so helpful to the winning candidate.